Barack Obama is coming to Beloit tomorrow. So's Chelsea Clinton. Clinton will speak first at 2PM in Pearsons, and Obama will have a 'rally' at 10PM in the Flood Arena. Come if you will.
Now, the unpleasant part.
* * *
Dear Mr. Obama: Michigan sez, "Thanks for caring"How the DNC's arbitrary bullshit lost them one vote, and maybe more
I'm sure yall with at least a finger in the political pie know at least a bit about the situation with the Democratic delegates from Michigan (and Florida). For those who've wised up and stayed away from the news this semester, here's the scoop: in mid-2007, the Michigan state legislature moved our D/R primaries up to January 15. Florida moved theirs up to January 29; however, i'm no expert on the details. This contravened DNC rules, which state that no state aside from Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada may hold a primary before February 5. Accordingly, the DNC stripped Michigan and Florida of all their delegates, and the Democratic candidates agreed to not campaign in either state.
Simply put, Michigan fucked up, so they take the fall, right?
Guess again.
Primarily,
the same penalty dealt to Michigan should have also been dealt to Iowa, et al. Section 11.A of the Democratic National Committee's
Delegate Selection Rules outlines the basics: only IA, NH, SC, and NV can hold primaries/caucuses before February 5. The tricky part is that these states are still bound by party rules on time. Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina violated these rules by moving their primary events further forward. According to the DNC's self-prescribed rules, Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina all committed the same sin as Michigan.
But there is an obvious discrepancy between the DNC's rules and the DNC's actions. Section 20.C.1.a sets the punishment for states that violate scheduling rules as a loss of 50% of said state's
pledged delegates and all of the state's superdelegates. Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina got away scot-free, while Michigan was inflicted
double the mandated penalty.
The Unholy Trinity claimed that they were 'forced' to adjust their primaries to maintain the proper order of primaries, justifying the unequal treatment. However, each state conveniently waited until after the DNC gave the good ol' Roman Thumbs Down to Michigan and Florida to reschedule their primaries. Now is this serendipity or blatant self-interest buoyed by electoral conservativism on the part of the DNC?
You'll never get a straight answer from the party leads, but the reason behind this egregious double standard is pretty damn clear. Their decision was made solely to preserve our current antiquated, flawed, unrepresentative and unfair system of primaries. Our punishment was meant to put us back in our place, with "place" defined for us by an apparently "Progressive" political machine.
And dare i mention that Iowa is 91.0% white and New Hampshire, 93.8%? Dare i suggest that delegates from Michigan and Florida (77.7% and 61.3% white, respectively) were stripped to prop up the traditionally earlier and whiter states? Dare i insinuate that minority voters are not valued as much as a stable, homogeneous, thoroughly white voting body? Dare i say that running a minority candidate does not absolve a political party of racism?
So don't bitch and moan about how "Michigan broke the rules" - Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina did, too. You want a square deal, you get all that comes with it.
* * *
Now Clinton wants to reinstate the phantom delegates from Michigan and Florida. This is where things get complicated.
Clinton can only gain from such a move. She took the majority vote in both states, so gaining the lost delegates would be a huge boost to her convention standing. Clinton's particularly rotten self-interest is particularly evident in the case of Michigan, where she was the only major candidate on the ticket. To then say that this was the 'legitimate' vote is underhanded, dishonorable, and just plain wrong.
But Obama has his own motives for maintaining the status quo. Even if another caucus was held in our state,
Obama could not win Michigan. Obama's stance on fuel efficiency et cetera, while something i personally agree with, is certainly something that would work against him in the Detroit area. His criticism of HRC's position on free trade will also be hard to explain, in light of their shared support of an expansion of NAFTA into Peru. Retrospectively, it's no wonder we haven't heard a peep from the Obama campaign pertaining to Michigan or Florida.
That is to say, Barack Obama wants Michigan to be excluded. Barack Obama does not want another caucus. Barack Obama does not want my vote, so he sure as hell won't get it.
* * *
The biggest shame of this is that it's not the Michigan state legislature, but rather the Democratic Party, that screwed the citizens of my home state. In doing so, the Democrats have ultimately screwed themselves for the national election.
I mean, are you kidding me, DNC!? You chose to alienate
swing states--the 1st and 4th largest--and for what? And most importantly, what possibly convinced you that screwing Florida & Michigan could be done without repercussions? I cannot speak for Florida, but this is only the latest fuckup in Michigan that's been attributed--falsely or no--to the Democratic Party. There was the budget crisis, the stubbornness of our unemployment rate, and certainly yalls across the lake have noticed your tuition increasing by leaps and bounds. We set the primary forward because the Democratic Party wasn't paying attention, and got the snub of a lifetime.
I am a disenfranchised voter. The stale argument that "Michigan knew what was coming" falls flat before the facts of the situation. The DNC acted beyond reasonable bounds in stripping Michigan's delegates, and did not extend their arbitrary judgment to other offending states. Fuck. That. Shit.
It's for this reason why i did not vote in the Michigan Primary, and it's why i will not vote in Wisconsin two days from now. Call me a whiner (there would definitely be legitimacy behind that argument), but hell--this could happen to you. I cannot, in good conscience, vote for a party that willingly gave me and my neighbors a thorough political ass pounding. I cannot vote for a party that values adherence to the Party Line above that singular American ideal, that everyone deserves a fair deal. That they would betray voters--that they would put the Party above the people it represents--sickens me.
I will not tell you not to vote. But if you do, you have to know that THIS is what you are voting for. You have to know that your name will join a political party that, while largely made up of wonderful and honest folks, is nevertheless headed by fuckwits who, in so many ways, couldn't deviate further from the basic principles of this country.